<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone Apps and using them using your iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://italkmagazine.com/iphone-apps-and-using-them-using-your-iphone/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://italkmagazine.com/iphone-apps-and-using-them-using-your-iphone</link>
	<description>For brand new iPhone, iPod Touch, and iPad users</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:25:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Israel Torres</title>
		<link>http://italkmagazine.com/iphone-apps-and-using-them-using-your-iphone/comment-page-1#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Israel Torres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.italkmagazine.com/?p=1197#comment-174</guid>
		<description>A lot of apps out there as simple as they are usually try and state that they just do one thing and just that one thing. Often there are tons of review commentary on how such apps suck because they only do one thing. I blame a lot of this misunderstanding on the users because it seems like they are just downloading blindly and not bothering to read what it does. Sure the author of the app may exclude added functionality but usually is able to state the basic function of what an app will do as well as in the screenshots they usually provide. Of course there are exceptions when an app really is poorly constructed and universally sucks. Apple iTunes rating system currently can&#039;t distinctly tell the difference of an opinionated suck compared to a design suck - hopefully they are working on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of apps out there as simple as they are usually try and state that they just do one thing and just that one thing. Often there are tons of review commentary on how such apps suck because they only do one thing. I blame a lot of this misunderstanding on the users because it seems like they are just downloading blindly and not bothering to read what it does. Sure the author of the app may exclude added functionality but usually is able to state the basic function of what an app will do as well as in the screenshots they usually provide. Of course there are exceptions when an app really is poorly constructed and universally sucks. Apple <a href="http://italkmagazine.com/goto/itunes" style="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" onmouseover="self.status='http://italkmagazine.com/goto/itunes';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">iTunes</a> rating system currently can&#8217;t distinctly tell the difference of an opinionated suck compared to a design suck &#8211; hopefully they are working on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

